I kept the style of boards consistent throughout, changing only the logo and the description of the briefs where appropriate. However, I was a little self aware of how little work I had to put on my boards. As the majority of my work was animation based and one brief was still on going, I did really have much work to present.
Overall, I received a measly two comments, which both focused on showing development work. So I found this crit to be extremely unuseful. As I haven't done anything like this before it would have been nice to receive feedback that was useful and relevant, however this wasn't the case and I am a little confused as to what worked and what didn't regarding my boards. Having said this, now that I have completed all of the briefs, I will have more work to display on my final submission boards and I feel that this will look a better. Because no comments were made, I think I will stick to the design I created for this crit and just make sure that I don't overload the boards and keep them as clean and consistent as possible.
Despite the lack of feedback on my individual practice boards, the boards that Molly had created for out collaborative brief received a lot more feedback. However, these were also based around the work rather than presentation. I had set up a computer with a loop of our 4 animations playing with sound and people really liked what we had done and how we had approached the brief. I'm really pleased that people liked what we had done and I feel that the project was a success.
Overall, I don't feel that I have benefited from this crit massively, but I feel that I have a basic understanding of how to present my work in a professional manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment